DeviantART is counting down to its 100 millionth deviation! Join in on the fun and take a look back at some of the most noteworthy deviations we've seen along the way. The deviant who uploads the 100 millionth deviation could win a special prize, too. Hurry, we're going to hit the 100 million mark soon!















Comments
great pic
--
um negão em alto contraste
The World is Yours
i like the illustration, not much for the message on this... oh well.
--
buy these prints...
now.
[link]
--
Enough of the carrot, it's time to use the stick, and by stick I mean a big motherfucking sledgehammer!
--
welcome to my eternal infinity
--
Everything I am, I am part of what I have seen___/
it's good.
I would say this though: wether there are WMD's in Iraq or not, Saddam really needed to be ousted. his regiem would never have been tolorated if it was a western nation.
--
the
|r|e|a|d| |b|e|t|w|e|e|n| |t|h|e| |l|i|n|e|s|
Contradicting the Bush administration, Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz told Vanity Fair that weapons of mass destruction had never been the most compelling justification for invading Iraq.
"For bureaucratic reasons we settled on one issue, weapons of mass destruction, because it was the one reason everyone could agree on." Everyone meaning, presumably, Powell and the Joint Chiefs of Staff. "Almost unnoticed but huge," he said, is another reason: removing Saddam will allow the U.S. to take its troops out of Saudi Arabia, where their presence has been one of al-Qaeda's biggest grievances.
For the last 12 years, all specific and sometimes heated policy disagreements notwithstanding, American presidents of both parties, joining a near-unanimous consensus of the so-called "world community," have agreed that the Baath party regime's persistent and never-fully-disclosed WMD program represented a grave threat to international security. Al Gore, for example, in his much-hyped antiwar speech last September, acknowledged that "Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to completely deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power. We know he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." The notion that the Bush administration's prewar reiteration of this view was a cynical ploy is crackpot.
For that matter, the notion that the Bush administration really, really, in its heart of hearts, had other, preferred reasons for taking out Saddam Hussein--particularly, that it did so to justify removing its troops from Saudi Arabia--and that the entire war was therefore a fraud . . . well, this idea, too, is crackpot.
--
ph33r da
Previous Page12345...Next Page